Is the evidence current?
Check the observation time and the freshness requirement for the control.
VitalSec field guide
Use this guide to interpret control states, validation results, evidence freshness, exposure windows, and risk direction. Each reading shows the requirement, the observed condition, and the evidence behind its status.
Compare the requirement with the observation, check its age, and review the validation record before closing a finding.
Reading details
Each reading identifies the control, its required state, the observed condition, and the observation time.
The specific security control being assessed.
What should be true here.
What was actually seen.
The status supported by the observation.
When the observation was taken.
Check the observation time and the freshness requirement for the control.
Compare the observed condition with the requirement and review any gaps.
Look at exposure time, retest results, repeat failures, and whether the result held.
01 — REQUIRED VS OBSERVED
Confirm that the source is authoritative for the condition being assessed and that its evidence meets the freshness requirement.
The reading is the comparison of required and observed state. Change the requirement and the same observation can read differently — which is why the requirement stays visible next to it.
Required and observed state
VitalSec shows which requirements the observed control fails to meet. Use that difference to define the remediation work.
02 — CONDITION VS CHECK
Current operating condition
Is this control in the state it is supposed to be in right now?
Tamper protection is off on 4 servers. Control state: DEGRADED.
Dated validation result
What did the check establish at the time it ran?
Retest after patching returned the required build. Test result: PASS.
A passing retest confirms the required condition at the time of the check. Subsequent observations establish whether that condition continues to hold.
03 — STATUS DEFINITIONS
Control states and validation results
control state
Observed, recent, and matching the required state.
Disk encryption on and policy confirmed 42 minutes ago.
Keep watching for drift.
control state
The control exists, but some part of the required condition is weaker than it should be.
EDR running, tamper protection disabled on part of the fleet.
Fix the weak part; do not treat it as fully covered.
control state / test result
The observed control or completed check fails the requirement.
Backup job failed on the last three scheduled runs.
Remediate the failure and retest to verify closure.
control state
VitalSec does not have usable current evidence for the condition.
Agent has not reported for 9 days; the last reading is stale.
Restore evidence collection and reassess the control.
test result
One specific check ran and the result met the requirement.
Retest after patching shows the required build is installed.
Record it, then confirm the control state keeps holding.
test result
The check ran, but the evidence is not strong enough for a reliable verdict.
Scan interrupted; partial data returned.
Resolve the interrupted or incomplete check, then run it again.
MISSING identifies absent or stale control evidence. INCONCLUSIVE identifies a check that needs additional evidence or another run.
04 — FRESHNESS AND STALENESS
HOW CONFIDENCE DECAYS
Each control has a freshness requirement. When its evidence expires, the control requires a new observation before its state can be confirmed.
0–24 hours
Recent enough to count as the current reading for this example.
1–7 days
Still visible, but weaker as an answer to whether the condition is true right now.
over 7 days
No longer treated as current. The reading falls back to MISSING until fresh evidence arrives.
05 — EXPOSURE WINDOW AND CLOSURE
Exposure window
worked example · 11 days open
The first observation establishes the start of the exposure window.
Approved remediation is performed. The exposure window remains open pending validation.
A check returns the required state. This is the point where the window can close.
Later observations continue to support the required state.
The horizontal span shows how long the exposure remained open. Track that duration from the first observation through verified closure.
06 — RISK DIRECTION
Gaps are closing faster than new ones appear, and verified fixes are holding.
what to check — Confirm the improvement comes from closure, not evidence dropping out of view.
New and resolved exposures are roughly balanced. Review the exposures that remain open.
what to check — Check whether the same controls keep coming back.
New gaps are outpacing closure, or exposure windows are getting longer.
what to check — Look at time to closure and repeat failures before adding more detection.
More readings are becoming MISSING as evidence expires or collection fails.
what to check — Treat visibility loss as a problem of its own.
The strictly positive lower bound of residual risk in the Ford Model for the system and assumptions being considered. R(t) is the modeled residual-risk state at time t, not the floor: R(t) ≥ R_min > 0.
Under the model's attracting-bound assumption, sustained compression drives risk toward R_min, the irreducible lower bound. Numerical estimates require evidence and validation for the system being modeled.
Read the Risk Floor paper07 — DEFINITIONS
Definitions
Use these definitions when reviewing control findings, remediation records, and risk measurements.
08 — ONE READING, DIFFERENT DECISIONS
Evidence by workspace
source reading
Multi-factor authentication — admins
DEGRADED
observed 51 min ago · window open 6 days
Each workspace uses the underlying evidence within its access permissions. Those permissions determine the available detail and permitted actions.
3 admin accounts are exempt from MFA. Owner: IT. Due in 4 days.
Named systems, named owners, and the work required to clear the reading.
MFA control: DEGRADED. Remediation in progress. First observed 6 days ago.
Whether the account can be presented accurately today and what still needs attention before renewal.
MFA does not currently meet the underwritten requirement. No retest recorded.
The reading against the relevant requirement and dated evidence when it changes.
MFA gaps present across part of the authorized book; median exposure window 9 days.
Concentration, evidence quality, and movement across the book without unnecessary account-level detail.
Work queued for this customer. Second occurrence of the same gap in 90 days.
What is outstanding, what was approved, what was retested, and what keeps recurring.
MFA readings: 62% GOOD, 21% DEGRADED, 17% MISSING evidence.
Where exposure or missing proof is concentrating across portfolio companies and whether closure time is improving.
NEXT
Review the controls VitalSec validates, the actions it supports, and the components that collect and preserve evidence.